I very rarely get to see the team play due to other commitments, maybe 1 home game out of 4.

But yesterday, Durbin made such a massive difference when he came on. Running from dummy half, running at pace, mixing things up etc. He really got Batley guessing and I reckon he was personally responsible for giving us all so much hope of at least a draw with at least a few minutes remaining.

Any idea why he was only put on so late? Is he not match fit?

Thats the million dollar question 'Why wait so late?' the game was crying out for his input, and when he came on it 'released' Watto to really create.

Only God and Kelly know the answer to that one........should be starting at HB for me with Watson....... with Ridyard on the bench.

on Lilford Park

Nasty man

Im being a bit harsh there were a few more who might as well have kept him company

Ridyard is only going to improve with game time but admittedly we need to fit Durbin in somewhere.

6,7, or 9 are the only positions he could be utilised really so NK has got some decision making to do.

I'm sure almost everyone underperformed yesterday. Maybe it's the kick up the ass we needed.

Why how many kicks do we need? we haven't played well in any games for longer than 30 minutes all told, a half good team will put 50 on us at the moment.

Maybe we should recall the "wonder kid" Dean Hatton

Ricky Hatton would be better

i'm not going to waste my time, i agree with all the above, kelly play durbin for longer, please, yes i know i'm not a qualified coach, but come on he should of been on either from the start or certainly begining of 2nd half at the latest.

As I understand it you bring your 2 nd hooker on when the defence is tireing at the end of the 1 st half , 30 minutes or so

That's what everybody else seems to do , Penky came on about that time last thursday and started ripping Widnes to shreds